Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co V. Eastern S S Corporation U.S. Supreme Court Transcript of Record with Supporting Pleadings
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co V. Eastern S S Corporation U.S. Supreme Court Transcript of Record with Supporting Pleadings Charles E Kremer
- Author: Charles E Kremer
- Date: 26 Oct 2011
- Publisher: Gale, U.S. Supreme Court Records
- Language: English
- Book Format: Paperback::34 pages, ePub, Audiobook
- ISBN10: 1270145738
- File size: 41 Mb
- File name: great-lakes-dredge-&-dock-co-v.-eastern-s-s-corporation-u.s.-supreme-court-transcript-of-record-with-supporting-pleadings.pdf
- Dimension: 189x 246x 2mm::82g
- Download: Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co V. Eastern S S Corporation U.S. Supreme Court Transcript of Record with Supporting Pleadings
After the Chicago River flooded a freight tunnel under the river and the basements of numerous buildings, petitioner corporation and other victims brought tort actions in state court against respondent Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. And petitioner Chicago. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, Plaintiff-appellant, v. 1993) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. This principle, however, never took the form of a holding of the Supreme Court, and, as early as 1850 the on maritime traffic appeared to be enough to support admiralty jurisdiction. City of Chicago, 107 U.S. 67B, 683 (1883)). Although Great Lakes installed the pile clusters outside the navigable channel, the court held this to be irrelevant because the navigable waterway extends from shore to 7 shore. Great Lakes, 3 F.3d at 229 (citing Greenleaf Johnson Lumber Co. V. Garrison, 237 u.s. 251, 263 (1915)). The court next cited the Admiralty Opinion for The Merchants National Bank of Mobile v. The Dredge General G. L. Gillespie, Etc., 663 F.2d 1338 Brought to you Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. Plains Pipeline, L.P. Et al v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company et al, No. 2:2013cv00398 - Document 93 (E.D. La. 2014) case opinion from the Eastern District of Louisiana U.S. Federal District Court United States v. Dockins Case Brief - Rule of Law: When there is no circumstantial evidence offered the government to show that records come from where they are said to come from, "there [is] no basis for a reasonable jury to conclude that these documents [are] what they purported to be. U.S. Supreme Court. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. V. Huffman, 319 U.S. 293 (1943). Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. V. Huffman. No. 849. Argued May 5, 6, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS In May 1993, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company (Great Lakes) hired Coastal Marine Towing (Coastal) to tow 500-foot lengths of dredge pipe and other equipment from Boca Grande to Green Cove on the East Coast of Florida. See Robins Drydock & Repair Co. V. Flint, 275 U.S. 303,308(1927). This argument International Stevedore Co. V. Haverty, 272 U.S. 50, 47 S.Ct. 19, 71 L.Ed. 157; Buzynski v. Luckenbach S.S. Co., 277 U.S. 226, 48 S.Ct. 440, 72 L.Ed. 860. In May 1993, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company (Great Lakes) hired Coastal Marine Towing (Coastal) to tow 500-foot lengths of dredge pipe and other equipment from Boca Grande to Green Cove on the East Coast of Florida. Case opinion for US Supreme Court JEROME B. GRUBART, INC. V. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. Et al., also on certiorari to the same court. Petitioner corporation and other victims brought tort actions in state court against respondent of admiralty jurisdiction where the rationale for the jurisdiction does not support it. Standard Dredging Corporation v. S/S SYRA, 290 F. Supp. 260 (D. Md. 1968) case opinion from the US District Court for the District of Maryland Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Chicago, an Illinois Municipal Corporation, Defendant-appellee,andjerome B. Grubart, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Claimant-appellee, 3 F.3d 225 (7th Cir. 1993) case opinion from the US Court Three years later, in 1917, in Southern Pacific Co. V. Jensen, 244 U.S. 205, 37 S. Ct. 524, 529, 61 L. Ed. 1086 (1917), the Supreme Court ruled that stevedoring is maritime in nature, and the employment a "maritime contract," and state legislation providing compensation to longshoremen injured in the performance of *450 their work was in Read the full text of Complaint of Great Lakes Dredge Dock Co. For free on Casetext. Plaintiff Great Lakes Dredge Dock Company ("Great Lakes") and plaintiff Lone Star Industries Lone Star and the Estate of Edward L. Palmer in New York State Supreme Court. Their pleading does not include a demand for a jury trial. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., 513 U.S. 527, 115 S.Ct. 1043, 130 L.Ed.2d 1024 (1995), affirming 3 F.3d 225 (7th Cir.1993), holds that Great Lakes' request for limitation of liability under 46 U.S.C. 181-96 comes within the admiralty jurisdiction. Capital Dredge and Dock Corporation, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Midwest Dredging Company, Defendant-appellee, 573 F.2d 377 (6th Cir. 1978) case opinion from the U.S. Court of U.S. Supreme Court O'Donnell v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., 318 U.S. 36 (1943) O'Donnell v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. No. 320. Argued January 6, 1943. Decided February 1, 1943. 318 U.S. 36. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR O'Donnell v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co U.S. Supreme Court Transcript of Record with Supporting Pleadings [EARL J WALKER, Additional Contributors, U.S. Supreme Court] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. The Making of Modern Law: U.S. Supreme Court Records and Briefs, 1832-1978 contains the world's most comprehensive collection of JEROME B. GRUBART, INC. V. GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK CO. Et al. Certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the seventh circuit No. 93 762. Argued October 12, 1994 Decided February 22, 1995* After the Chicago River flooded a freight tunnel under the river and the basements of numerous buildings, petitioner corporation and other vic- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co v. Huffman U.S. Supreme Court Transcript of Record with Supporting Pleadings [R EMMETT KERRIGAN, Additional Contributors, U.S. Supreme Court] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. The Making of Modern Law: U.S. Supreme Court Records and Briefs, 1832-1978 contains the world's most comprehensive collection of U.S. Supreme Court Senko v. LaCrosse Dredging Corp., 352 U.S. 370 (1957) Senko v. LaCrosse Dredging Corp. No. 62. Argued December 12, 1956. Decided February 25, 1957. 352 U.S. 370. Syllabus. Petitioner was employed respondent in dredging operations. The dredge was anchored to the shore at all times during petitioner's employment, and was In August and September, 1991, Great Lakes Dredge &. Dock Company ("Great Lakes") replaced the pilings of a pier. That supported the Kinzie Street Bridge pursuant to a contract. With the City of Chicago.' The pilings kept ships from bumping. The pier.2 Great Lakes The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed, 134 F.2d 213, holding that the statute, in exacting from employers contributions to the state unemployment compensation fund, is a valid exercise of the state taxing power (see Steward Mach. Co. V. Davis, 301 U. S. 548; Carmichael v.
Read online Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co V. Eastern S S Corporation U.S. Supreme Court Transcript of Record with Supporting Pleadings